🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.